You are not currently logged in. Please create an account or log in to view the full course.

Issues and Debates – Psychology as a Science

5. The Day Science Broke

This is the course trailer. Please create an account or log in to view this lecture.

 
  • Description
  • Cite

About this Lecture

Lecture

In this lecture, we take a deep dive into ‘the day science broke’, focusing in particular on: (i) this being a field-wide phenomenon of failings in the research method, starting with a review of Daryl Bem’s prescience/precognition study; (ii) the problem with Daryl Bem’s conclusion being that prescience was a concept of fantasy, yet peer reviewers could not find fault in his scientific method; (iii) the example of Diederik Stapel, used to highlight how data can simply be fabricated, leading to unfounded conclusions being made without the scientific community realising; (iv) the replication crisis, a phenomenon in psychological research founded by the failed replication of results from around 60% of studies which had their methodologies and analyses replicated.

Course

In this course, Dr Paterson (University of Glasgow) walks through the method and construction of psychological research, looking to understand psychology as a science. In the first lecture, we focus on hypotheses as an initial step in developing a research study, contextualising them into the three primary goals of science – to make new knowledge, to explain phenomena, and to predict what will happen next. In the second lecture, we take a powerful tool in the hands of researchers – theories, providing a history lesson on the development of memory theories by Ebbinghaus and Bartlett. The importance of understanding theories is highlighted here, demonstrating with this example that seemingly contradictory theories can complement one another and inform the development of a more comprehensive theory. In the third and fourth lectures, we look at the mechanics of the scientific method and how it informs a researcher’s ability to accept or reject their null hypothesis, through finding evidence for their theory. Next, we lead on from the latter part of lecture four’s discussion of replication, by discussing ‘the day science broke’; exploring reasons why classic studies have not been able to be replicated with matching results. In the sixth and final lecture, we expand on this by looking at some other potential failings of the scientific method.

Lecturer

Dr Helena Paterson is a lecturer in the School of Psychology at the University of Glasgow, responsible for teaching both research methods and social psychology. Dr Paterson’s research interests lie in the development of dynamic social events. One focus of this is understanding how human qualities are represented by the human cognitive system and, by extension, how we develop representations of social events and the accompanying stereotypes/biases. Dr Paterson is an advocate of open science, incorporating its principles into her research and teaching. Some of Dr Paterson’s recent publications include ‘Open-source tutorials benefit the field’ (2022) and ‘Data visualization using R for researchers who do not use R’ (2022).

Cite this Lecture

APA style

Paterson, H. (2021, November 15). Issues and Debates – Psychology as a Science - The Day Science Broke [Video]. MASSOLIT. https://massolit.io/courses/understanding-psychology-as-a-science/the-day-science-broke

MLA style

Paterson, H. "Issues and Debates – Psychology as a Science – The Day Science Broke." MASSOLIT, uploaded by MASSOLIT, 30 Nov 2021, https://massolit.io/courses/understanding-psychology-as-a-science/the-day-science-broke

Image Credits

Get instant access to over 5,800 lectures